@article { author = {Ahmadloo, Niloofar and Heidarpourfard, Marzieh and Najib, Fatemeh and Shiravani, Zahra and Omidvari, Shapour and Mosalaei, Ahmad and Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad and Ansari, Mansour and Nasrollahi, Hamid and Khanjani, Nezhat and Kadkhodaei, Behnam and Hamedi, Sayed Hasan}, title = {The Feasibility and Safety of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial}, journal = {Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention}, volume = {24}, number = {4}, pages = {1321-1330}, year = {2023}, publisher = {West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.}, issn = {1513-7368}, eissn = {2476-762X}, doi = {10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1321}, abstract = {Background: The present study aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: In this single-arm clinical trial, patients with cervical cancer (stages IB3-IVA) received a median four cycles of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin, every three weeks) followed by dCRT (which consisted of the whole pelvis at the dose of 45-50 Gy along with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy at the total dose of 80-90 Gy). Primary end point was local control at three months, which was assessed by gynecologic examination and pelvic MRI. The secondary outcome of the study was treatment-related toxicity. Results: Seventy-four patients with the mean age of 51.6 ± 9.5 years were included. The most frequent (51.4%) disease stage was IIB. Complete and partial clinical responses were observed in 60.8% and 14.9% of patients, respectively. The frequency of progressive disease and stable disease were 14.9% and 9.5%, respectively. Grade II and III neutropenia (during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5% and 2.7%, respectively; these figures during chemoradiation were 29.7% and 13.5%, respectively. A treatment interruption was observed for 60.8% (45 cases) of patients during chemoradiation and 31.1% during  induction chemotherapy. Discussion and conclusion: Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is feasible in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; however, the toxicity should be managed properly to avoid delayed e treatment. More than three quarters of the patients achieved complete or partial clinical response within a three-month follow-up.}, keywords = {locally advanced cervical cancer,induction chemotherapy,definitive chemoradiation}, url = {https://journal.waocp.org/article_90581.html}, eprint = {https://journal.waocp.org/article_90581_0f878d1937d76a64137490ff2f139bc4.pdf} }