<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2008</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Genotype-phenotype Relationship between DNA Repair Gene Genetic Polymorphisms and DNA Repair Capacity</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>501</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>505</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">24804</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Genotype-phenotype relationships between genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and DNA repaircapacity were evaluated in a case-control study of breast cancer. Selected DNA repair genes included were thoseinvolved in double-strand break repair (ATM, XRCC2, XRCC4, XRCC6, LIG4, RAD51, RAD52), base excisionrepair (LIG1), nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1), and mismatch repair (hMLH1). The subjects consisted ofhistologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n=132) and controls (n=75) with no present or previous history ofcancer. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms of 10 genes (ATM -5144A&gt;T, IVS21+1049T&gt;C, IVS33-55T&gt;C,IVS34+60G&gt;A, and 3393T&gt;G, XRCC2 31479G/A, XRCC4 921G/T, XRCC6 1796G/T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51135G/C, 172G/T, RAD52 2259C/T, LIG1 583A/C, ERCC1 8092A/C, 354C/T, hMLH1 5’ region -93G/A, 655A/G)were determined by TaqMan assay (ATM) or MALDI-TOF (all other genes). DNA repair capacity was measuredby a host cell reactivation assay of repair of ultraviolet damage. The DNA repair capacity (%) did not differbetween cases (median 37.2, interquartile range: 23.6-59.6) and controls (median 32.7, interquartile range:26.7-53.2). However, DNA repair capacity significantly differed by the genotypes of ATM and RAD51 genesamong cancer-free controls. Our findings suggest that DNA repair capacity might be influenced by geneticpolymorphisms of DNA damage response genes and DNA repair genes.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">DNA Repair</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">genetic polymorphisms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">physiological influence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Breast Neoplasms</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_24804_516af7c480e127f8458455fbb8980d45.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
