<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1031</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1034</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">25652</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;: Her2/neu is a biomarker which is amplified and/or overexpressed in a subset of breast cancerpatients who are eligible to receive trastuzumab. Her-2 gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situhybridisation (FISH) and/or protein over-expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the two mainmethods used to detect Her-2 status in clinical practice. The concordance rate between the two techniques iscontroversial. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods&lt;/b&gt;: FISH analysis were performed on 104 tumoural samples from breast cancer patientswith known IHC results to determine the Her2 gene status. The FISH/IHC analyses results were then comparedand the concordance rate was determined. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: Her2 gene amplification was detected in 0 of IHC score 1+,24/86 (27.91%) 2+, and 8/13 (61.54%) 3+. The IHC and FISH results concordance rates were 100%, 27.9%,and 61.5% for IHC scores of 1+, 2+, and 3+ respectively. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusion&lt;/b&gt;: The results of this study suggest that IHC1+ should be considered as negative while IHC 2+ results need further confirmative analysis by FISH. Furtherquality control and standardization of IHC technique are required to improve the concordance rate betweenthe two methods.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">breast cancer</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">HER2</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Trastuzumab</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">immunohistochemistry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">fish</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_25652_f0d4f991f81a77b0fb2a8f1e674557bd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
