<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>11</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Clinical Outcomes of Cases with Cervical Dysplasia Absent in Cold Knife Conization Specimens</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>6693</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>6696</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">28356</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Cold knife conization is a surgical procedure that allows both diagnosis and treatment of cervicallesions at the same time. It is mainly performed for indications of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN). In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of cases without CIN in cold knife conizationspecimen, following a high-grade lesion (CIN2/3) in cervical biopsy. Materials and &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods&lt;/b&gt;: We performed aretrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital between January 1st 2008 and August 1st 2012. Cases thatunderwent cold knife conization for CIN2/3 within the study period were included. Cone-negative (Group 1) andcone-positive (Group 2) cases were analyzed for various clinical parameters, and were compared in the 1-yearpost-conization period for histological recurrence and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA status. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: A totalof 173 women underwent cold knife conization for CIN2/3 within the study period. Twenty-two cases (12.7%)were included in Group 1 and 151 cases (87.3%) in Group 2. There were no significant differences between thetwo groups in terms of age, gravidity, parity, menopausal status and HPV-DNA status (pre-conization and 1year post-conization) (p&gt;0.05). Recurrence rates were also similar between the groups (9.1% vs 9.9%, p&gt;0.05).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions&lt;/b&gt;: Clinical outcomes were similar in terms of histological recurrence and HPV persistence after 1year of follow-up between cone-negative and cone-positive cases. Clinical follow-up of cone-negative cases shouldtherefore be performed similar to cone-positive cases.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cold knife conization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">human papillomavirus</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cervical intraepithelial neoplasia</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_28356_1702f3275bb6edd1f0623ffdb50b3ff6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
