<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>9</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Cancer Screening Adherence of Asian Women According to Biochemically-verified Smoking Status: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>4081</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>4088</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">31039</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Men and women who smoke tend to show less compliance to screening guidelines than nonsmokers.However, a recent study in Korea showed that self-reported female smokers constituted less than halfof cotinine-verified smokers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify hidden smokers using cotinineverifiedmethod and examine cancer screening behavior according to biochemically verified smoking status.Materials and &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods&lt;/b&gt;: Among 5,584 women aged 30 years and older who participated in the Fourth and FifthKorea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 372 (6.66%) hidden smokers wereidentified based on interview responses and verified by urinary cotinine levels. We compared cancer-screeningbehavior (cervical, breast, stomach, and colon cancer) of female hidden smokers to that of non-smokers and selfreportedsmokers by cross-sectional analysis. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: Hidden female smokers had significantly lower adherenceto breast cancer screening compared to non-smokers (aOR (adjusted odds ratio) [95% CI] = 0.71 [0.51–0.98]).Adherence to stomach cancer (aOR [95% CI] = 0.75 [0.54–1.03]) and cervical cancer (aOR [95% CI] = 0.85[0.66–1.10]) screening was also lower among hidden female smokers compared to non-smokers. Self-reported(current) smokers showed lowest adherence to cervical cancer (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI0.47-0.87), breast cancer(0.47 [0.32-0.68]), stomach cancer (0.66[0.46-0.95]), and colon cancer (0.62 [0.38-1.01]) screening compared tonon-smokers, followed by female hidden smokers, then non-smokers. These lower adherence rates of currentsmokers were attenuated after we incorporated hidden smokers into the current smoker group. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions&lt;/b&gt;:Cancer screening adherence of female hidden smokers was lower than cotinine-verified non-smokers but higherthan current smokers. Considering the risk of smoking-related cancer among women, identifying hidden smokersis important to encourage appropriate cancer screening.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cancer screening</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hidden smoker</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">female smoker</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_31039_9c64ea98dae038ea40387a121f265000.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
