<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>19</Volume>
				<Issue>7</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Risk Calculation: a Meta-Analysis</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1747</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1752</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">65369</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1747</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ricvan Dana </FirstName>
					<LastName>Nindrea</LastName>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Doctoral Program, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>	Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang City, Indonesia.</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1844-3323</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Teguh </FirstName>
					<LastName>Aryandono</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1143-4125</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Lutfan </FirstName>
					<LastName>Lazuardi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Iwan </FirstName>
					<LastName>Dwiprahasto</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different machine learning algorithms&lt;br /&gt;for breast cancer risk calculation. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted of published research articles on diagnostic&lt;br /&gt;test accuracy of different machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk calculation published between January 2000&lt;br /&gt;and May 2018 in the online article databases of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO. Paired forest plots were employed for&lt;br /&gt;the analysis. Numerical values for sensitivity and specificity were obtained from false negative (FN), false positive (FP),&lt;br /&gt;true negative (TN) and true positive (TP) rates, presented alongside graphical representations with boxes marking the&lt;br /&gt;values and horizontal lines showing the confidence intervals (CIs). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC)&lt;br /&gt;curves were applied to assess the performance of diagnostic tests. Data were processed using Review Manager 5.3&lt;br /&gt;(RevMan 5.3). Results: A total of 1,879 articles were reviewed, of which 11 were selected for systematic review and&lt;br /&gt;meta-analysis. Fve algorithms for machine learning able to predict breast cancer risk were identified: Super Vector&lt;br /&gt;Machine (SVM); Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); Decision Tree (DT); Naive Bayes (NB); and K-Nearest Neighbor&lt;br /&gt;(KNN). With the SVM, the Area Under Curve (AUC) from the SROC was &gt; 90%, therefore classified into the excellent&lt;br /&gt;category. Conclusion: The meta-analysis confirmed that the SVM algorithm is able to calculate breast cancer risk with&lt;br /&gt;better accuracy value than other machine learning algorithms.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Breast cancer risk</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">calculation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Machine Learning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">algorithms</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_65369_3bb0837a34fec5a8fc794abdcbba7274.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
