<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP), APOCP's West Asia Chapter.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1513-7368</Issn>
				<Volume>20</Volume>
				<Issue>7</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Staging and Response Evaluation to Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancers Using 18FDG PET/ CT with Standardized Protocol</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>2003</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>2008</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">88628</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2003</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nosheen </FirstName>
					<LastName>Fatima</LastName>
<Affiliation>Section of NM and PET/CT Imaging, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0000-1681-6416</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maseeh Uz </FirstName>
					<LastName>Zaman</LastName>
<Affiliation>Section of NM and PET/CT Imaging, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-9586-7034</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Areeba </FirstName>
					<LastName>Zaman</LastName>
<Affiliation>Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Unaiza </FirstName>
					<LastName>Zaman</LastName>
<Affiliation>Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rabia </FirstName>
					<LastName>Tahseen</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-9586-7034</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sidra </FirstName>
					<LastName>Zaman</LastName>
<Affiliation>Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Background: Precise staging of esophageal cancer (EC) is important for selection of optimal treatment option&lt;br /&gt;and prognostication. Aim of this study was to assess the role of 18FDG PET/CT in staging and response evaluation&lt;br /&gt;to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCR) in EC patients using standardized imaging protocol. Material and methods:&lt;br /&gt;This prospective study was conducted at PET/CT Section of Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital&lt;br /&gt;Karachi, Pakistan from July 2017 till February 2018. We included 34 biopsy proven EC patients who had 18FDG&lt;br /&gt;PET/CT and CT of neck, chest and abdomen as part of initial staging. Eleven patients had post-nCR 18FDG PET/CT&lt;br /&gt;using standardized imaging protocol as per EANM guidelines. CT and PET/CT based staging was compared. Based&lt;br /&gt;on PERCIST criteria, response evaluation was assessed using change in highest SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) in baseline&lt;br /&gt;and follow-up scans (primary lesion, node or extra-nodal metastases). Results: Mean age of cohort was 57 ± 14 years&lt;br /&gt;(23 males and 11 females) having adenocarcinoma (AC) in 23 and squamous cell cancer (SCC) in 11 patients. Mean&lt;br /&gt;18FDG dose, uptake time and hepatic SUVmean for baseline scans were 169 ±54 MBq, 65 ±10 minute and 1.91 ± 0.49&lt;br /&gt;which were within ± 10%, ± 15% and ± 20% for follow-up scans in 11 patients respectively. Mean size (craniocaudal&lt;br /&gt;dimension in mm) and SUVmax of primary tumor was 56 ±27 mm and 13.4 ± 4.7. Based on 18FDG PET/CT findings,&lt;br /&gt;patients were categorized into N0 (10/34), N1 (09/34), N2 (11/34) and N3 (04/34) while 11/32 had stage IV disease.&lt;br /&gt;No significant difference was seen in AC and SCC groups. CT found stage IV disease in 3/34 (09%) while PET/CT&lt;br /&gt;found in 11/34 (32%; p value: 0.019) cases. PET/CT showed concordance with CT in 41% while discordance (all&lt;br /&gt;with upstaging) seen in 59%. On follow-up PET/CT, complete metabolic response was seen in 5/11 (45%) and partial&lt;br /&gt;metabolic response was noted in 6/11 (55% - p value non-significant) patients. Median %ΔSUVmax over primary&lt;br /&gt;lesions was 49.84% (-32.69 -100%) while over nodal sites it was 41.18% (-82.60 -100%). Conclusion: We conclude&lt;br /&gt;that 18FDG PET/CT was found a sensitive tool in initial staging of EC. Compared with CT, it had higher diagnostic&lt;br /&gt;accuracy for distant nodal and extra-nodal metastasis. %ΔSUVmax between baseline and post-nCR studies acquired&lt;br /&gt;with standardized protocol had changed management in more than half of our patients. For response evaluation in EC&lt;br /&gt;more studies with standardized 18FDG PET/CT imaging protocols are warranted.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Esophageal Cancer</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">staging and response evaluation, neoadjuvant chemoradiation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">18FDG PET/CT and CT</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">standardized protocol</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journal.waocp.org/article_88628_ba9f2694fbdc9f6352a7f3ea24a38360.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
