Background: Gastric carcinoma is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies worldwide. Somestudies have suggested that it has a worse prognosis in non-elderly than in elderly patients. The aim of the presentstudy was to clarify whether the patient’s age is an independent prognostic factor. Methods: A total of 742 patientswith gastric carcinoma, who had registered in our cancer registry center between years 2001- 2006 were reviewedto investigate the prognostic significance of age. They were divided into the following two groups: non-elderly(under 70 years) and elderly (70 years or older). The clinicopathological features were reviewed retrospectivelyand a multivariate analysis was carried out. Results: Lymph node metastasis and differentiated type were morefrequently observed in non-elderly than in elderly patients (P<0.0001) and older patients diagnosed with moreadvanced stages compared with those younger than 70 years old (P=0.015). 5-year survival rates were 27.2 and15.2% in non-elderly and elderly patients, respectively, the difference being statistically significant (P<0.001).Multivariate analysis showed that age and wall penetration were independent prognostic factors Conclusions:Age clinically serves as an important predictor of survival in patients with gastric carcinoma and elderly patientswith gastric carcinoma have a worse prognosis than nonelderly patients.
(2010). Impact of Age on Prognosis in Iranian Patients with GastricCarcinoma: Review of 742 Cases. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11(2), 335-338.
MLA
. "Impact of Age on Prognosis in Iranian Patients with GastricCarcinoma: Review of 742 Cases". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11, 2, 2010, 335-338.
HARVARD
(2010). 'Impact of Age on Prognosis in Iranian Patients with GastricCarcinoma: Review of 742 Cases', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11(2), pp. 335-338.
VANCOUVER
Impact of Age on Prognosis in Iranian Patients with GastricCarcinoma: Review of 742 Cases. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2010; 11(2): 335-338.