Background: The concordance rate between immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) results for HER2/neu according to clinical performance is controversial. The present prospective studywas theerefore conducted in Indian breast cancer patients. Methods: Fifty cases (n=50) of invasive duct cancerof breast tested for HER-2/neu by IHC and scored as 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ by pathologists were further analyzed byFISH using a commercially available double-color probe, and the findings compared. Results: A total concordanceof 82.0% was observed with a Kappa coefficient of 0.640 (P < 0.001). A high discordance was observed in 30.0%of the patients with IHC 2+, 7.1% in IHC 3+, 19.2% overall in IHC 0 and 1+. Conclusion: IHC can be usedfirstly to screen the HER-2/neu status, and FISH can be used as a supplementary role to IHC and 2+ and somenegative cases. And only those cases with HER-2/neu status of IHC 3+ or FISH positive should be treated withHerceptin (Trastuzumab).
(2011). Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER-2/neu and Fluorescent-In–Situ Hybridization (FISH) Gene Amplification of Breast Cancer in Indian Women. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12(1), 179-183.
MLA
. "Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER-2/neu and Fluorescent-In–Situ Hybridization (FISH) Gene Amplification of Breast Cancer in Indian Women". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12, 1, 2011, 179-183.
HARVARD
(2011). 'Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER-2/neu and Fluorescent-In–Situ Hybridization (FISH) Gene Amplification of Breast Cancer in Indian Women', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12(1), pp. 179-183.
VANCOUVER
Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER-2/neu and Fluorescent-In–Situ Hybridization (FISH) Gene Amplification of Breast Cancer in Indian Women. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2011; 12(1): 179-183.