Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is well established as the standard of care and initial management ofchoice for patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). The response is however not uniform. The present studywas an endeavor to develop a clinically applicable tool based on the available clinico-pathological data in theroutine clinical setting to predict response to chemotherapy in breast cancer in a developing country. From 1stJune 2005 to 30th June 2007, 149 patients registered at INMOL hospital with ABC at initial diagnosis havingtumor size 5 cm or more and treated with FAC as NACT were prospectively included in the study to analyzeassociation of response after first cycle of chemotherapy (initial clinical response) with that after the thirdcycle. Tumor measurements were done at base line (before starting chemotherapy), three weeks after the firstcourse of chemotherapy and three weeks after the third course. Percentage change was calculated for the lattertwo stages. Clinical response was assessed according to WHO/UICC criteria. Pathological complete response(pCR) was based on the histopathology of the operative specimen after NACT. 67.1% patients (cCR 7.4%+cPR59.7%) responded to chemotherapy while 32.9% (cSD 23.5%+cPD 9.4%) did not. pCR rate was 4%. No patienthad initial clinical complete response while 23% had icPR, 74% had icSD and 3% had icPD. All patients withicPR responded to NACT (cCR 29%+cPR 71%) while 60% of icSD responded to chemotherapy (cCR 1%+cPR59%) and 40% of icSD failed to respond (cSD 31%+cPD 9%). All patients with icPD developed cPD. The highsensitivity of initial clinical response for prediction of cCR and 100% specificity of icPD for prediction of cPDfavors its incorporation in clinical practice, as an early predictor of response to NACT in ABC patients.