Introduction: Her2/neu is a biomarker which is amplified and/or overexpressed in a subset of breast cancerpatients who are eligible to receive trastuzumab. Her-2 gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situhybridisation (FISH) and/or protein over-expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the two mainmethods used to detect Her-2 status in clinical practice. The concordance rate between the two techniques iscontroversial. Methods: FISH analysis were performed on 104 tumoural samples from breast cancer patientswith known IHC results to determine the Her2 gene status. The FISH/IHC analyses results were then comparedand the concordance rate was determined. Results: Her2 gene amplification was detected in 0 of IHC score 1+,24/86 (27.91%) 2+, and 8/13 (61.54%) 3+. The IHC and FISH results concordance rates were 100%, 27.9%,and 61.5% for IHC scores of 1+, 2+, and 3+ respectively. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that IHC1+ should be considered as negative while IHC 2+ results need further confirmative analysis by FISH. Furtherquality control and standardization of IHC technique are required to improve the concordance rate betweenthe two methods.
(2011). Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH). Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12(4), 1031-1034.
MLA
. "Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH)". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12, 4, 2011, 1031-1034.
HARVARD
(2011). 'Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH)', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12(4), pp. 1031-1034.
VANCOUVER
Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH). Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2011; 12(4): 1031-1034.