Aim: To clarify any association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and susceptibility to gastriccancer. Methods: A meta-analysis based on 11 eligible case-control studies involving 5,107 subjects was carriedout to summarize the data on the association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and gastric cancer risk. Results: No association was found between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and gastric cancer risk (dominantmodel: OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.83-1.09, p = 0.486, ph (p values for heterogeneity) = 0.419; additive model: OR =1.02, 95% CI: 0.81-1.30, p = 0.850, ph = 0.181; recessive model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80-1.48, p = 0.586, ph =0.053). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicity (Asian and Caucasian) and smoking status (ever smoker and neversmoker) did did notpresent any significant association. Sensitivity analysis did not perturb the results. Conclusions:This study strongly suggested there might be no association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism andgastric cancer risk. However, larger scale studies are needed for confirmation.
(2012). Lack of Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(4), 1145-1149.
MLA
. "Lack of Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13, 4, 2012, 1145-1149.
HARVARD
(2012). 'Lack of Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(4), pp. 1145-1149.
VANCOUVER
Lack of Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2012; 13(4): 1145-1149.