Aim: The significance of the mucinous adenocarcinoma in TNM staging and prognosis for colorectal tumorpatients is still controversial. The aim was to provide a meta-analysis for TNM staging and prognostic featuresof colorectal tumors. Methods: 30 individual case-control studies were finally included into this meta-analysis,involving a total of 444,489 cancer cases and 45,050 mucinous adenocarcinomas, of relations with TNM stagingand prognostic features. Results: Compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinoma patients, the TNM IV stageaccounted for a larger percentage of mucinous adenocarcinomas (OR=1.48, 95%CI 1.28-1.71, POR<0.001) andthe prognosis was significantly poor (HR=1.06, 95%CI 1.04-1.08, P<0.001). After heterogeneity testing, the resultswas similar to the holistic approach outcome (HR=1.48, 95%CI 1.35-1.62, P<0.001). Conclusion: Compared topatients with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, mucinous adenocarcinoma patients with later TNM staging makeup a big percentage, and mucinous adenocarcinoma is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.
(2012). TNM Stages and Prognostic Features of Colorectal and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients: a Meta Analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(7), 3427-3430.
MLA
. "TNM Stages and Prognostic Features of Colorectal and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients: a Meta Analysis". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13, 7, 2012, 3427-3430.
HARVARD
(2012). 'TNM Stages and Prognostic Features of Colorectal and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients: a Meta Analysis', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(7), pp. 3427-3430.
VANCOUVER
TNM Stages and Prognostic Features of Colorectal and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients: a Meta Analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2012; 13(7): 3427-3430.