Objective: The aim of our study is to compare an ovarian malignancy prediction model based on age andfour sonographic findings (OMPS1) with a new model called OMPS2 which differs just by adding serum CA125measurement to (OMPS1). Methods: In a cross sectional comparative study OMPS1 was validated in 830 operatedovarian masses within a 3 years period (2006-2009). Logistic regression analysis was used to construct OMPS2based on OMPS1 adding serum CA125 findings. The area under the curve for two models was compared in411 patients. Results: OMPS2 was calculated as follows: OMPS1 + 1.444 (if serum CA125= 36-200) or 3.842 (ifserum CA125 is more than 200). AUC of OMPS2 was increased to 84.3% (CI 95% 78.1- 89.8) in comparison toOMPS1 with AUC of 78.1% (CI 95% 71.8-84.5). Conclusion: Our second model is more accurate in predictionof ovarian malignancy, compared with our first model.
(2012). Comparison of Two Ovarian Malignancy Prediction Models Based on Age Sonographic Findings and Serum Ca125 Measurement. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(8), 4199-4202.
MLA
. "Comparison of Two Ovarian Malignancy Prediction Models Based on Age Sonographic Findings and Serum Ca125 Measurement". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13, 8, 2012, 4199-4202.
HARVARD
(2012). 'Comparison of Two Ovarian Malignancy Prediction Models Based on Age Sonographic Findings and Serum Ca125 Measurement', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(8), pp. 4199-4202.
VANCOUVER
Comparison of Two Ovarian Malignancy Prediction Models Based on Age Sonographic Findings and Serum Ca125 Measurement. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2012; 13(8): 4199-4202.