Objective: To evaluate the effect of intravenous contrast on dose calculation in radiation treatment planningfor oesophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 22 intravein-contrasted patients with oesophageal cancer wereincluded. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the enhanced blood stream in thoracic great vessels and heart wasoverridden with 45 HU to simulate the non-contrast CT image, and 145 HU, 245 HU, 345 HU, and 445 HU tomodel the different contrast-enhanced scenarios. 1000 HU and -1000 HU were used to evaluate two non-physiologicextreme scenarios. Variation in dose distribution of the different scenarios was calculated to quantify the effectof contrast enhancement. Results: In the contrast-enhanced scenarios, the mean variation in dose for planningtarget volume (PTV) was less than 1.0%, and those for the total lung and spinal cord were less than 0.5%. Whenthe HU value of the blood stream exceeded 245 the average variation exceeded 1.0% for the heart V40. In thenon-physiologic extreme scenarios, the dose variationof PTV was less than 1.0%, while the dose calculations ofthe organs at risk were greater than 2.0%. Conclusions: The use of contrast agent does not significantly influencedose calculation of PTV, lung and spinal cord. However, it does have influence on dose accuracy for heart.
(2013). Influence of Intravenous Contrast Medium on Dose CalculationUsing CT in Treatment Planning for Oesophageal Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(3), 1609-1614.
MLA
. "Influence of Intravenous Contrast Medium on Dose CalculationUsing CT in Treatment Planning for Oesophageal Cancer". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14, 3, 2013, 1609-1614.
HARVARD
(2013). 'Influence of Intravenous Contrast Medium on Dose CalculationUsing CT in Treatment Planning for Oesophageal Cancer', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(3), pp. 1609-1614.
VANCOUVER
Influence of Intravenous Contrast Medium on Dose CalculationUsing CT in Treatment Planning for Oesophageal Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2013; 14(3): 1609-1614.