Aim: To investigate the effectiveness and adverse effects of gemcitabine by fixed-dose rate infusion plusoxaliplatin (GEMOX regimen) as second-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: 64 patients withadvanced ovarian cancer were divided into an experimental group (44 cases) and a control group (20 cases).The experimental group was treated with continuous intravenous infusion of gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 with afixed-dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min, on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin at 100 mg/m2 on day 1, IVGTT, repeated every3 weeks. The control group was treated with intravenous infusion of gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 within 30 minon days 1 and and oxaliplatin at 100 mg/m2 on day 1, IVGTT, again repeated every 3 weeks. CT scans or MRIwere used for review every 1-2 cycles. Results: The effective rate in the experimental group was significantly highthan control group (43.2% vs 35.0%; P < 0.05), with no obvious difference of hematologic or non-hematologictoxicity between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: GEMOX regimen is very effective to treat advancedovarian cancer, with low toxicity, good tolerance and improved life quality in patients.
(2013). Phase II Clinical Study on the GEMOX Regimen as Secondline Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(6), 3949-3953.
MLA
. "Phase II Clinical Study on the GEMOX Regimen as Secondline Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer", Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14, 6, 2013, 3949-3953.
HARVARD
(2013). 'Phase II Clinical Study on the GEMOX Regimen as Secondline Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(6), pp. 3949-3953.
CHICAGO
, "Phase II Clinical Study on the GEMOX Regimen as Secondline Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer," Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14 6 (2013): 3949-3953,
VANCOUVER
Phase II Clinical Study on the GEMOX Regimen as Secondline Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2013; 14(6): 3949-3953.