Objective: This study investigated the correlation between participation in the treatment decision-making process and satisfaction with the process among Japanese women with breast cancer. The influence of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on satisfaction with the treatment decision-making process was also examined. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered internet survey of 650 Japanese women with breast cancer in March 2016. Decisional role (active, collaborative, passive) in the treatment decision-making was elicited using the Japanese version of the Control Preference Scale. Satisfaction with the decision-making process was assessed. Result: About half of the participants preferred to play a collaborative role, while half of the participants perceived that they played an active role. Satisfaction among the participants who made their treatment choice collaboratively with their physicians was significantly higher than that of participants who made the choice by themselves or entrusted their physicians to make the decision. However, two-way ANOVA demonstrated that satisfaction level was associated with the congruence between the participants’ preferred and actual decisional roles, but not with the actual decisional roles that they played. This association had no interaction with sociodemographic and clinical status, except for education level. A majority of the participants who participated in the roles they preferred in choosing their treatment option indicated that they would participate in the same role if they were to face a similar decision-making situation in the future. Conclusion: Regardless of their role played in the cancer treatment decision-making process, and irrespective of their sociodemographic and clinical status, Japanese women with breast cancer are more satisfied with the treatment decision-making process when their participation in the process matches their preferred role in the process.
Yamauchi, K., Nakao, M., Nakashima, M., & Ishihara, Y. (2017). Congruence between Preferred and Actual Participation Roles Increases Satisfaction with Treatment Decision Making among Japanese Women with Breast Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18(4), 987-994. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.4.987
MLA
Keiko Yamauchi; Motoyuki Nakao; Mitsuyo Nakashima; Yoko Ishihara. "Congruence between Preferred and Actual Participation Roles Increases Satisfaction with Treatment Decision Making among Japanese Women with Breast Cancer". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18, 4, 2017, 987-994. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.4.987
HARVARD
Yamauchi, K., Nakao, M., Nakashima, M., Ishihara, Y. (2017). 'Congruence between Preferred and Actual Participation Roles Increases Satisfaction with Treatment Decision Making among Japanese Women with Breast Cancer', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18(4), pp. 987-994. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.4.987
VANCOUVER
Yamauchi, K., Nakao, M., Nakashima, M., Ishihara, Y. Congruence between Preferred and Actual Participation Roles Increases Satisfaction with Treatment Decision Making among Japanese Women with Breast Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2017; 18(4): 987-994. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.4.987
)