Qualitative Improvement Methods Through Analysis of Inquiry Contents for Cancer Registration

Boo, Yoo-Kyung; Lim, Hyun-Sook; Kim, Jung-Eun; Kim, Kyoung-Beom; Won, Young-Joo

doi:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1663

Qualitative Improvement Methods Through Analysis of Inquiry Contents for Cancer Registration

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

¹ Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Health Industry, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.

² Department of Public Health Administration, Hanyang Women’s University, Seoul, Korea.

³ Cancer Registration and Statistics Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

⁴ Department of Psychiatry, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1663

Abstract

Background: In Korea, the national cancer database was constructed after the initiation of the national cancer registration project in 1980, and the annual national cancer registration report has been published every year since 2005. Consequently, data management must begin even at the stage of data collection in order to ensure quality. Objectives: To determine the suitability of cancer registries’ inquiry tools through the inquiry analysis of the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR), and identify the needs to improve the quality of cancer registration. Methods: Results of 721 inquiries to the KCCR from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed by inquiry year, question type, and medical institution characteristics. Using Stata version 14.1, descriptive analysis was performed to identify general participant characteristics, and chi-square analysis was applied to investigate significant differences in distribution characteristics by factors affecting the quality of cancer registration data. Results: The number of inquiries increased in 2005–2009. During this period, there were various changes, including the addition of cancer registration items such as brain tumors and guideline updates. Of the inquirers, 65.3% worked at hospitals in metropolitan cities and 60.89% of hospitals had 601–1000 beds. Tertiary hospitals had the highest number of inquiries (64.91%), and the highest number of questions by type were 353 (48.96%) for histological codes, 92 (12.76%) for primary sites, and 76 (10.54%) for reportable. Conclusions: A cancer registration inquiry system is an effective method when not confident about codes during cancer registration, or when confronting cancer cases in which previous clinical knowledge or information on the cancer registration guidelines are insufficient.

Keywords

Main Subjects