Dosimetric Study to Estimate Deviations in Delivered Radiation Dose due to Occluded Air Spaces in Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy Applications

Srinivas, Challapalli; Banerjee, Sourjya; Lobo, Dilson; Athiyamaan, M S; Ramamoorthy, Ravichandran; Johan, Sunny; Abhishek, Krishna; Ajaykumar, Silpa; Kumar E S, Arun

doi:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.5.1659

Dosimetric Study to Estimate Deviations in Delivered Radiation Dose due to Occluded Air Spaces in Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy Applications

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore , Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

² Department of Radiation Physics, Cachar cancer hospital &Research Centre, Silchar, Assam, India.

³ Department of Radiation Oncology, Malabar Cancer Centre (Postgraduate Institute of Oncology Science & Research), Moozhikkara P.O, Thalassery, Kannur District, Kerala, India.

10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.5.1659

Abstract

Background: To develop a dosimetric tool to estimate the dose delivered in the presence of air pockets with EBT3 film while simulating the conditions of vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVBT) with 3.0 diameter cylindrical applicator at a prescription dose distance of 5mm from the surface of it. Materials and Method: Six acrylic plates (10 cm x 10 cm, 0.5 cm thick) with four different types of slots were designed and produced locally. They can hold a cylindrical vaginal brachytherapy applicator in the centre, air equivalent material from the applicator’s surface [(sizes 4.5 mm (A), 3.0 mm (B), and 2.0 mm (C)], EBT3 film at the prescribed dose distance, and holder rods. Plates were layered together with acrylic rods and assembled in a holding box in a water phantom. Three treatment plans done in TPS with prescription doses of 2 Gy, 3 Gy, and 4 Gy at 5.0 mm with a treatment length of 6 cm, and were executed in Co-60-based HDR brachytherapy unit (M/s SagiNova, Germany) with & without the placement of air equivalent material, and the dose received at slot locations A, B, & C were noted. Results: The mean percentage deviation of measured dose without and with presence of air pocket at A, B and C was 13.9%, 11.0% and 6.4% respectively for all dose prescriptions. As the air pocket size expanded radially from 2.0 mm to 4.5 mm, the increase in dosage ranged from 6.4% to 13.9% which was due to the fact that the film was held at dosage prescription distance and the lack of attenuation of photons radially through air pocket. Conclusions: The present study can be carried out with a 3D printed phantom that simulates VVBT application having air pockets of different dimensions at different locations and also can be analyzed with Monte Carlo simulations.

Keywords

Main Subjects