Comparative Study of Dysphagia-optimized Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) and Standard Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (S-IMRT) and Its Clinical Correlation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Batham, Shally; Gupta, Seema; Ghosh, Arunima; Gupta, Indra Jeet; Johny, Danial; Srivastava, Shraddha; Singh, Navin; Bhatt, MLB; Gupta, Rajeev; Bhosale, Vivek Vidyadhar; Negi, MPS

doi:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3697

Comparative Study of Dysphagia-optimized Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) and Standard Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (S-IMRT) and Its Clinical Correlation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

¹ Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

² Molecular & Structural Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

³ Toxicology and Experimental Medicine Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3697

Abstract

Objective: Dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures like constrictor muscles and larynx can lead to improved functional outcomes in head and neck cancer patients treated by chemoradiation. Methods: A total of 50 Patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy proven AJCC stage II–IV head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) were prospectively studied. 25 patients were randomized in each arm of Dysphagia-optimized Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) arm and Standard Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (SIMRT) arm. Additional dose constraints were applied to the dysphagia/aspiration at risk structures (DARS) in Do-IMRT arm. The impact of using Do-IMRT was assessed by the difference in mean scores of MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), University of Washington-Quality of Life (UW-QOL), and 100 ml Water Swallow Test (WST). Results: Patients in both arms showed significant (P <0.01 or P < 0.001) improvement in MDADI (global and composite), UW-QOL and Water Swallow Test scores. However, the improvements were found significantly higher in Do-IMRT as compared to S-IMRT. Significant improvements i.e. mean change from baseline to 12 months (P <0.05 or P <0.01 or P <0.001) were 19. 2, 8.6, 14.3, 7.4, 18.6 and 22.0% higher respectively in Do-IMRT as compared to S-IMRT in MDADI global and composite scores, UW-QOL swallowing scores, and 100 ml Water Swallow (swallowing volume, swallowing capacity and swallowing speed) test scores. Conclusion: The Do-IMRT improves swallowing functions compared to S-IMRT in HNSCC patients treated with radical chemoradiation.

Keywords