A Study to Analyze Impact of Treatment Couch and Immobilization Devices on Surface Dose for Megavoltage Photon Beams

D, Palanivelu; D, Khanna; P, Mohandass; Bhalla, Narandra Kumar; R, Prabhu; M, Chandru; Puri, Abhishek

doi:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4133

A Study to Analyze Impact of Treatment Couch and Immobilization Devices on Surface Dose for Megavoltage Photon Beams

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

¹ Department of Physical Sciences, School of Sciences, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.

² Department of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Cancer Institute, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.

10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4133

Abstract

Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of treatment couch and immobilization devices on surface dose for megavoltage photon beams. Material/Methods: Percentage surface dose (PSD) measurement was carried out in Elekta Synergy™ Linear accelerator using PTW Markus® Parallel plate ionization chamber of volume 0.05cm3 with water equivalent RW3 Slab phantom (PTW, Germany). The measurement depth was considered at 0.07mm. The reference PSD was measured at 0° gantry angle with 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2 field sizes and 100cm SSD for 4MV, 6MV and 15MV photon beams. For comparison, PSD measurement was carried out at 180° gantry angle inclusion of treatment couch (TC), All in One positioning system (AIO – PS) and Vac lok Cushions (VLC). Results: Beam angle at 0°, for field sizes 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2, the PSD was observed as 30.9%, 40.5%, 48.7% for 4MV; 23.7%, 33.8%, 42.2% for 6MV; and 17.0%, 29.6%, 38.6% for 15MV respectively. Beam angle at 180° with TC, an increase in PSD by maximum of 65.0% for 4MV, 64.9% for 6MV and 55.9% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle. The PSD increased when beam angle was 180° with TC and AIO – PS were 65.0% for 4MV, 67.4% for 6MV, and 60.9% for 15MV than 0° angle. Similarly, increased PSD for beam angle at 180° with TC and VLC were 66.8% for 4MV, 66.8% for 6MV and 61.3% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle. Conclusion: For all three-photon energies, at 180° gantry angle, the PSD increased significantly in case of TC, VLC, and AIO – PS for all the field sizes as compared to gantry angle at 0°. It is necessary to consider TC, AIO – PS and VLC during dose calculation to ensure accuracy of patient treatment delivery.

Keywords

Main Subjects