Document Type : Research Articles
Authors
1
Anatomic Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
2
Faculty of Medicine, Horus University-Egypt (HUE), New Damietta, Egypt.
3
Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in breast carcinoma therapies, drug resistance mechanisms as anti-apoptosis and anti-pyroptosis limit the application of these therapies. This work assesses the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of Caspase1 and EGFR in breast carcinoma and analyzes their clinicopathological associations as prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets. Caspase1/EGFR expression patterns are utilized to specify breast carcinoma patients who may benefit from these therapies. Methods: After reviewing the hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and the routine breast carcinoma IHC stains (estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, HER2/NEU, Ki-67) by two pathologists and preparation of tissue microarray blocks, anti-Caspase-1 and EGFR IHC staining was performed using Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) technique. Intensity and percentage-based scoring was applied dividing the 153 included breast carcinomas into Caspase1-negative and positive expression groups; and EGFR low and overexpression groups. Groups were statistically analyzed in relation to age, tumor size, histological and molecular subtype, grade, nodal status, metastasis/recurrence, TNM stage and Ki-67 proliferation index. Kaplan-Meier’s analysis was used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Combined patterns based on Caspase1 and EGFR expression status were created to stratify patients into prognostic groups. Results: Caspase1 was positive in 54.2% of breast carcinomas and its positivity was significantly associated with smaller tumor size, absence of metastasis/recurrence, luminal A and B molecular subtypes and longer OS (p<0.05). EGFR overexpression was detected in 32.7% of carcinomas and was significantly associated with larger tumor size, TNBLBC and a shorter OS (p<0.05). Caspase1-negative/EGFR-overexpression pattern comprised 14.4% of carcinomas and had the worst prognostic associations including larger tumor size, metastasis/recurrence, TNBLBC subtype and shortest OS (p=0.002, 0.002, 0.004 and ≤0.001 respectively). Conclusions: Combined Caspase1/EGFR IHC expression may provide a tool for selection of patients who benefit from combined EGFR-inhibitors with miR-155-5p down-regulators or photodynamic therapy via induction of apoptosis/pyroptosis in EGFR-overexpression carcinomas through enhanced Caspase1 signaling.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)