Short Course Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer; Safety and Response Rate

Aghili, Mahdi; Babaei, Mohammad; Bayani, Reyhaneh; Jaberi, Ramin; Amouzegar Hashemi, Farnaz; Kalaghchi, Bita; Rezaei, Saeed; Jafari, Fatemeh; Vand Rajabpour, Mojtaba; Garousi, Sorour; Garousi, Maryam

doi:10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3119

Short Course Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer; Safety and Response Rate

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

² Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

³ Radiation Oncology Department, Yas General Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

⁴ Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

⁵ Radiation Oncology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3119

Abstract

Objective: Overall treatment time (OTT) is an important index for local control in patients with locally advanced‌ cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation (External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT), Brachytherapy (BT) and concomittant chemotherapy). This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of reducing OTT by shortening the brachytherapy duration to one week in the intervention group copared to three weeks in the control group. Method: The study was a non-randomized open-label phase II clinical trial, carried out on 49 cervical cancer patients (26 in intervention grouop and 23 in control group) who received EBRT concomitant with Cisplatin, followed by brachytherap in order to deliver 60 Gy equivalent total doses in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) to Intermediate Risk-Clinical Tumor Volume (IR-CTV) and 85-90 Gy EQD2 to High Risk-Clinical Tumor Volume (HR-CTV). In the intervention group, all brachytherapy sessions were performed in 1 week, while for the control group, it was administrated in 3 consecutive weeks. The participants were followed (Minimum follow up time was 6 month and median follow up time was 10 month) to assess response and toxicity of the treatment. Results: Overall, more than 95% of study participants had a complete response and more than 4.0% reported partial response, and no treatment failure was observed. The complete response in intervention and control groups was 96.1% and 95.6%, respectively (P value > 0.05). There was no difference in acute toxicity between the two groups. Conclusion: considering that short course brachytherapy was non inferior to conventional course from point of Response Rate and Side Effects during follow up time; so this strategy can be considered as an option for reducing the OTT which can at least cause decreasing the costs. Studies with larger sample size and phase 3 are recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects