Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University. 681 Samsen Road, Dusit District 10300, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background/Aims: Variations in cirrhosis management practices and care quality affect patient prognoses and outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the number of successful cirrhosis care processes and the relationship between the quality statement implementation and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Eighteen process-based methods were independently assessed. Measurement indices for each participant were selected per cirrhosis severity. Service quality was determined using standard settings for each process-based gap scale. The optimal care group comprised participants who adhered to all instruction quality indices. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed the 90-day readmission and mortality rates relating to the optimal quality care. Results: Of the 205 patients (73.2% male; mean age, 62.7±11.8 years), the median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 15.35 (9.37–21.37), and the majority were Child–Pugh B/C. Previously set performance gaps were observed for 13/18 quality processes, and 5/13 clinical processes attained the final goal. Paracentesis in ascites patients, antibiotic administration within 12 hours of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis diagnosis, and precipitating factors identification with lactulose therapy were the top three quality index (QI) accomplishments. Out of 205 patients, 84 attained optimal care. Concerning optimal care, although the readmission rate remained same, patients with decompensated Child-Pugh C who received excellent complete QI care had significantly increased both 1-month (100% vs. 43.5%; p=0.022) and 3-month (100% vs. 26.1%; p=0.022) survival in comparison to those receiving incomplete QI care. Conclusion: Using quality metrics for the appropriate stage of individual cirrhosis treatment is advocated as best practice. Adherence to standard practices improves clinical outcomes.
Munsakul, N., Chalermsuksant, N., & Sethasine, S. (2024). Relationship between Quality Practice Metrics and Treatment Outcomes in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 25(12), 4153-4159. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4153
MLA
Natt Munsakul; Nalerdon Chalermsuksant; Supatsri Sethasine. "Relationship between Quality Practice Metrics and Treatment Outcomes in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 25, 12, 2024, 4153-4159. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4153
HARVARD
Munsakul, N., Chalermsuksant, N., Sethasine, S. (2024). 'Relationship between Quality Practice Metrics and Treatment Outcomes in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 25(12), pp. 4153-4159. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4153
VANCOUVER
Munsakul, N., Chalermsuksant, N., Sethasine, S. Relationship between Quality Practice Metrics and Treatment Outcomes in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2024; 25(12): 4153-4159. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4153
)