Validation of Identifying Cancer Diagnosis Based on Self-Reported Information in the Japan Nurses’ Health Study

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Division of Cancer Statistics Integration, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045 Japan.

2 Gunma University Center for Mathematics and Data Science, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi City, Gunma 371-8511 Japan.

3 Graduate School of Health Science, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi City, Gunma 371-8514 Japan.

4 Division of Health Services Research, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045 Japan.

Abstract

Background: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS) is a large-scale, nationwide prospective cohort study of female nurses. This study aimed to examine the validity of self-reported diagnosis of cancer among the JNHS cohort members (N=15,019). Methods: For women who reported any diagnosis of five cancers (stomach, colorectal, liver, lung and thyroid) in the biennial follow-up surveys, an additional outcome survey, medical facility survey, and confirmation of death certificate (DC) were conducted. The JNHS Validation Study Committee (referred to as “the committee”) made a final decision on the reported outcomes. To examine the validity of self-reported diagnosis of cancer, the positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated using the committee’s decision as the gold standard. To examine the validity of the committee’s decision based on self-reports and DCs, PPV was calculated using physician-reported information as the gold standard. Results: The PPV of self-reported diagnosis in the biennial follow-up surveys was 77.8% for stomach, 66.2% for colorectal, 41.7% for liver, 60.2% for lung, and 64.6% for thyroid cancer. The corresponding PPVs in the additional outcome survey were 96.2%, 80.7%, 62.5%, 82.5%, and 96.9%, respectively. The PPV of the committee’s decision was 100% for stomach, 87.5% for colorectal, 94.7% for lung, and 100% for thyroid cancer (data not available for liver cancer). The proportion of DC-only cases among committee-defined cases was below 10% for all cancers except liver cancer (28.6%). Conclusions: The validity of identifying cancer diagnosis based on self-reported information in the JNHS was favorable for stomach, colorectal, lung and thyroid cancer.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume 23, Issue 2
February 2022
Pages 651-657

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 04 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 04 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics