Exploring the Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Wilms Tumor 1 Exon 7 Mutation Status with Combinations of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 Mutations as Potential Molecular Biomarkers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Normal Cytogenetics

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Molecular Diagnostics, Division of Cancer Research, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, University of Kerala, India.

2 Department of Cancer Research, Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Molecular Diagnostics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.

3 Medical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.

4 Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, University of Kerala, India.

Abstract

Aim: This study explores the prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and WT1 mutations both independently and in combination in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia (CN-AML) patients as they exhibit varying clinical outcomes. Methods: 150 CN-AML patients were selected to assess the prevalence and prognostic significance of WT1 mutations in combination with FLT3-ITD and NPM1 status using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Sanger sequencing. Results: WT1 exon 7 mutations were present in 12.6% of patients. Elderly individuals, with a mean age of 49.4 years, were more prone to NPM1 mutations, though the association was not statistically significant (p=0.094). Significant associations were observed between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels with FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations (p=0.003 and p=0.04, respectively). The M4 subtype exhibited the highest prevalence of WT1 mutations (p=0.0036). Patients with NPM1 mutations had a higher overall survival rate compared to NPM1 wild-type cases (p=0.057). There was no significant correlation between overall survival and WT1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Regarding relapse-free survival, NPM1 mutation cases exhibited a higher survival probability compared to NPM1 wild-type cases. Similarly, WT1 mutated cases had a higher survival probability compared to WT1 wild-type cases, although these differences were not statistically significant. The combined mutation statuses of NPM1/FLT3-ITD with WT1 did not yield significant outcomes. The study suggests that larger cohort studies may reveal more relevant associations, given the relatively small cohort in this study. Conclusion: This study found a significant association between patient survival outcomes and NPM1 mutation status, as well as the combined FLT3-ITD and NPM1 status. Profiling both NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations at the time of diagnosis serves as a robust prognostic marker in AML treatment. WT1 mutation status did not show a significant association with patient outcomes. Larger population studies may provide more relevant insights.

Keywords

Main Subjects